© by David Taylor
Five months after its formation on 29
January 1799, the Neapolitan Republic was teetering
under the combined onslaught of Cardinal
Ruffo's popular, royalist army of Sanfedisti
recruited from the bellicose peasants and bandits of
Calabria, and the Lazzaroni, poor, unemployed,
but devotedly royalist Neapolitans. Into the blue
background of the bay slipped Nelson, ready and
willing to castigate the defeated Republicans on the
orders of the Neapolitan monarchs. The aftermath was
brutal and bloody and served to show what would have
happened in France had the aristocracy ever regained
power.
Revolutions
followed by counter-revolutions, blood-lettings and
heavy handed repression: it all sounds rather par for
the course until it becomes clear that those who may
have stood to gain the most from the end of the monarchy
had fought tooth and nail to defend it. And those
Republicans put to death, imprisoned and exiled for
their part in establishing the Republic were not
revolutionaries from the lower social orders but lords,
gentlemen, generals, admirals, writers, poets,
scientists, philosophers and lawyers. Among them were
names from the most respectable Neapolitan families such
as Caracciolo, Filangieri and Pignatelli; indeed many of
the young men who withstood siege in Castel dell'Ovo
were more familiar with the feel of vellum than the
muzzle of a musket.
philosophical beginnings
Benedetto Croce ( 1866 - 1952), Neapolitan man of letters, was convinced that this class of intellectual revolutionaries had its origins in a southern Italian political tradition formed in the 17th century by such men as Tommaso Cornelio, who in 1649 brought the work of English and French philosophers (especially Hobbes and Descartes) to Naples, and Giuseppe Valletta, who made public his collection of 'books written in free countries' and initiated relations with the Royal Society of London.
Many Neapolitan
academics embraced the philosophy of Descartes and from
the ensuing battle between these Cartesian Rationalists
and the previously dominant Aristotelian Schoolmen there
arose a new, enlightened, political class.This class was
strongly anti-Jesuit in nature and gave rise to a
religious and political freedom in Naples, which was the
envy of many who lived in states where freedom of
thought and expression was heavily suppressed.
reason and reform
Armed with their faith in Reason, the new middle-class intelligentsia pushed for far-reaching reforms in such varied fields as religion, economics and land law. Naturally, there were martyrs along the way but there were many reforms achieved in the 18th century which sought to undermine the power of the barons, the Jesuits and,in the words of the Archbishop of Taranto, 'popery, the perpetual enemy of the Kingdom'. From 1734, the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies was ruled by the Bourbons and many reforms were carried out during the rule of Charles III. But it is perhaps in his successor, Ferdinand, that we begin to understand how an absolute monarch could find such unexpected succour from the unenlightened, uneducated masses who had groaned for centuries under the yoke of a feudalism which the Republicans hoped to lift from them. Ferdinand was known as the Re Lazzarone; a popular king with a common turn of speech and manners, in whom the common folk could find an affinity; a monarch dedicated to hunting, gaming and houseparties, who appealed to the plebeian nobleman - a man's king, and so more appealing to the lower classes than the highbrow intellectuals and academic activists who by 1792 were catalyzing into the conspiratorial Jacobin societies which would eventually form the Republic. Within three years of the French Revolution, Neapolitans were corresponding with French Patriotic Societies, and soon masonic lodges in Naples were forming into Jacobin 'clubs' where a conspiracy grew to overthrow the monarchy. Upon its discovery, the leaders of the plot were either imprisoned or exiled. Those who remained went to ground. Many of the exiles went to serve as soldiers or advisors in the French Revolutionary Army.
Croce believed that
the ideas carried around Italy by these exiles, and the
communications they had with other Italian
intellectuals, were responsible for the semination of a
new idea of liberty, i.e. government by an intellectual,
economically productive class. This according to Croce
would eventually help break down Italian provincialism,
thus stimulating the idea of Italian nationhood. So
convinced was he that the germ of a united Italy lay in
this enforced spread of ideas that he shouts out in
print: 'Here is the birth of modern Italy, the new
Italy, our Italy!'
a troubled life
For those Jacobins who remained in Naples, January 1799 promised the realization of their dreams. The victorious French army was sweeping down upon Naples, its ranks bolstered by Neapolitans, and the Royal Family had fled to Sicily the previous December. Castles were quickly occupied and the Republic declared. The founders had problems from the beginning: insurrection was rife among the lazzaroni; the businessmen of the Kingdom, grown rich on reforms, were too occupied with their profits to take much notice; and there were difficulties in rallying the provinces, where the king had always been a distant but shining light, untainted by the warts which proximity would have shown. Faced with such problems, the Republican government never managed to implement any administrative or legislative programme.
The monarchs'
reaction was to despatch Cardinal Ruffo to Calabria to
drum up a popular army with which to retake Naples.
Events in France had shown them that they were on
fundamentally different sides to the reformers whose
flag was now fluttering from the bastions of Naples.
This was despite the reforms which had been achieved
through collaboration between the two sides.
Furthermore, the monarchs had by now entered into
alliances with conservative powers, namely England (see
Lord Nelson and
Lady Hamilton), Austria and Spain.
holy war
The struggle for power was extremely fierce and has been described as a religious war between Jacobinism and the old, superstitious, monarchic religion --and like all religious wars it was pitiless. The lazzaroni had shown their devotion by delaying the French entry into the city; Cardinal Ruffo's army and other zealots who attacked the Republican city were called Sanfedisti (defenders of the Holy Faith), and his Calabrians (whom even Napoleon expressed fear of) are reputed to have seen the campaign as a holy war waged against infidels. As soon as the French army withdrew to the northern theatre of war, the Republic fell to the legions of Sanfedisti and lazzaroni, who began sacking the city then applauded the punitive measures taken by the monarchs and the English against the Republicans.
Naples, but a very
different one, returned to Ferdinand, who was able
briefly to set up throne there until the return of the
French and rule by Joseph Bonaparte (1805 - 08) and Joachim Murat (1808 - 15); But
such had been the peculiar nature of the Parthenopean
Republic that, whilst in France a sign of nobility was
to have lost a relative to the guillotines of the
Terror, in Naples it was to have lost a forebear to the
Jacobin cause.
Other articles on this website relevant to this period in Neapolitan history are:
Eleonora
Fonseca Pimentel
Lord Nelson and
Lady Hamilton
On Trial for their Reputations
to main index home page
to history portal