I had lunch today with a 95-year-old
gentleman named Franco. He told me that his father
passed away in the 1950s, also at a ripe old age. We
did some quick figuring and determined that his father
was born in 1867. That was the year that Marx
published Das Kapital, the year in which The
Beautiful Blue Danube was played for the first
time, and the year in which the British North American
Act created the Dominion of Canada. The typewriter was
invented in 1867 and it was the year that Czar
Alexander II sold Alaska to the United States. Rome
was not yet the capital of a united Italy. I was one
generation removed from all that. (Somehow, all that
makes me feel very young rather than very old. That
seems strange.)
I am in the midst
of a "pump the elderly for information" campaign about
the situation in southern Italy following the
unification of Italy —that is, in the decade following
the unification in 1861, the year in which Piedmont,
Lombardy, Parma, Modena, Lucca, Romagna, Tuscany, and
the former Kingdom of the Two Sicilies (of which Naples
was the capital) were united under Piedmont's Victor
Emmanuel II to form the modern nation state of Italy.
(Rome would become the capital in 1870).
The reason for my
campaign is the few enquiries I have received about
northern mistreatment of the south following unification
—or, to use the terminology of those southerners who
express themselves vehemently about that period, the
"rape of the south". There certainly is no shortage of
material in Naples on the subject. I have even seen a
book about "the Savoy concentration camps," in which the
title uses the Nazi term "Lager" (from Konzentrationslager)
just so you don't miss the point. I am looking now at a
book entitled They Were the Real Bandits, those
Brothers of Italy. The title contains an allusion
to the first line of the Italian national anthem, known
as The Hymn of Mameli (after the author of the
text, Goffredo Mameli, 1827-49). The line starts, "Fratelli
d'Italia…" (Brothers of Italy), that phrase
being the alternate title of the anthem, itself. The
music is by Michele Novaro (1818-85). This particular
book is a condemnation of all the figures popularly
connected with the Risorgimento, the movement to
unify Italy; that is, Garibaldi is little more than a
thug in charge of a band of mercenaries in the hire of
northern hyenas such as Cavour and Victor Emmanuel II.
The defeat of the Kingdom of the Two Naples (The Kingdom
of Naples) by the forces of Garibaldi and Victor
Emmanuel was the beginning of mass unemployment and
general misery for the south and the beginning of
immigration away from the former Kingdom of Naples, thus
depleting its greatest resource, people who want to
work. And so on and so forth.
[Also see this entry on "bandits"]
I didn't get much from Franco, except something I already knew —the Risorgimento is sacrosanct in modern Italian history. You may take issue with the way it was done; that is, you may say something like "The unity of Italy (Risorgimento) was inevitable, but perhaps the invasion and conquest of the south was not. Maybe it could have been handled in another way." But you can't argue with the premise that Italy was to be one. The term, itself, Risorgimento means rebirth, resurgence, resurrection (all that). It is the name that Cavour gave to the newspaper he founded in 1849. In the opening paragraph of the first issue, he spoke of the need for a "political and economic risorgimento". The name stuck and became the name of the movement, itself, to unify Italy.
It would, however, be a mistake to view that movement strictly as the idea of northerners such as Garibaldi, Cavour, and Mazzini. Indeed, much of the philosophy underlying Italian unity comes from the south, from the members of the so-called Neapolitan Enlightenment such as Vincenzo Cuoco. Indeed, the first secret societies agitating for unity were the "carbonari", a southern invention. Thus, the drive to unity was broad-based. Could it have been achieved in any other way than by an invasion of the south? (The what-if school of history is always fun!) It turns out that on a least two occasions, Victor Emmanuel proposed an alliance with the Kingdom of Naples. He and the Neapolitans would divvy up the peninsula. Since this would entail taking over the Papal States (except for the city of Rome, itself), the King of Naples turned down the proposal as blasphemous. And, thus, Garibaldi did what he did; he invaded Sicily and then the Italian mainland. He disobeyed Victor Emmanuel, by the way. "Don't invade the mainland," was the order. Garibaldi wrote a nice note, asking for permission to "disobey". It is not clear that he waited for the return mail.
Thus, according to these books I am looking at, began a ten-year period of intense suffering for the south: looted treasury, industrial plants carried off, unjust imprisonment and even execution of Neapolitan citizens, etc. As I say, Franco was no help, other than to tell me that his grandfather, born in the 1840s, was a proud member of the Bourbon army of the Kingdom of Naples. I have one more gentleman on my list of those to be pumped. He is 105 years old. He is in good health, but now says he is feeling tired. Lunch next week, I hope.
Note on the spelling of Immanuel,
Emmanuel, Emanuel: there are variations in English
versions of the book of Isaiah (7:14) "...and
they shall call his name Immanuel..." (also Emmanuel —
but always two mm's). In Italian, the common given
name is Emanuele — one m. All
references to the Savoy dynasty and their kings of
Italy are spelled Vittorio Emanuele I, II, and III —
one m, one l. If you are writing about
them in English, it is correct to use two m's
-- that is, "There is a monument to Victor Emmanuel II
in Rome." If you are inserting the name of my street
into an English sentence, cite it as it written on the
street sign. "He lives on Corso Vittorio Emanuele."
(Hint: it's easier to write Corso V.E. They'll know
who you're talking about.) p.s. Modern Italian Bibles
that I have seen cite the name in Isaiah as
"Emmanuel".
====================entry
2===========================
The Mysterious
Courtesan of Naples
We Still Don't Know
Who this Woman
is! Do We
Care?
We really do know, but I just found out a few minutes,
so
you have to wait
until the very end to read it. I hope I
haven't offended any Mysterious Courtesans.
History is hell.
Yes. At least one source links her to Giuseppe
Garibaldi, the liberation of The Two Sicilies (alias
the Kingdom of Naples) and, hence, the creation of
modern Italy.
The date: May
1860. Garibaldi, smuggles a small and almost unarmed
(!) group of men out of the port of Genoa aboard two
leaky tubs and sets off to liberate the Italian south.
He starts in Sicily in support of a local uprising,
and works his way over to the mainland and on up to
the capital, the city of Naples. He cajoles weapons
and ammo out of a few armories along the way as he
plods south toward Sicily, where his famous "Thousand
redshirts" (1,089, to be exact) take on a regular army
twenty times that number. He set sail from Genoa on
May 5 and landed in Sicily on May 11, 1860. He picks
up some Sicilian irregulars and they overrun Royalist
forces. He now has 3,500 men under him. They cross to
the mainland on August 19 and start the 300-mile slog
in the heat of summer up towards Naples. Garibaldi's
reputation precedes him. Peasants already call him the
"Father of Italy," mothers bring babies out to be
blessed by him, and there is an air of invincibility
about him as he moves north.
Thus
the unlikely sight, on Sept. 7, 1860, of Garibaldi and
a small group of companions entering Naples unopposed,
by train (!) from Salerno and then in an open carriage
from the station to the Royal Palace. They are miles
ahead of the army. The king has fled to Gaeta. Naples
and remaining troops welcome the Risorgimento by
giving Garibaldi a hero's welcome. On October 25th,
near Capua, Garibaldi greets Victor Emanuel of
Piedmont's Royal House of Savoy with the words, "Greetings
to the first King of Italy" and surrenders his
conquests —Sicily, half the Italian peninsula and the
vast Neapolitan Royal Navy— because it's the right
thing to do. For the six weeks between Sept.7 and Oct.
25, Garibaldi rules Southern Italy as "Dictator of
Naples".
Foreign interest in Italy ran very high
in 1860. For this we turn to Sir Henry George Elliot
(1817 – 1907). He was a
British diplomat noted for his time in 1859 as
Minister in Naples and in 1863 as Minister to the King
of Italy till 1867. That is, he was a link from the
Kingdom of Naples to the Garibaldi dictatorship to the
modern nation of Italy. If anyone knows more about the
Mysterious Courtesan of Naples, he might be the one.
He was a prolific writer. Among his writings is
Some Revolutions and Other Diplomatic Experiences
(pub. date 1922 by J. Murray, London.) It contains
this passage on p. 104 (speaking of his time in
Naples):
"I forget whether I mentioned yesterday that Mazzini
had arrived here, and that one or two demonstrations
that were
wished to be made in his
honour have been put down. Another person has also
arrived, and caused no less sensation—
i.e., the fair 'Skittles' —
who is now at the Hotel Vittoria, where she
will meet another frail sister, known as the Countess
Martini, but now travelling
in a becoming uniform with Garibaldi's army, to which
she professed to be a Florence
Nightingale,
and in that character
collected offerings, which however, stopped short in
her own pocket, at which the Dictator [Garibaldi] is
not over
well pleased."
Ah-HAH! you say. Not so fast, I say. The ‘fair
skittles’ was a very well-known society courtesan
named Catherine Walters
who numbered Napoléon III and Edward VII amongst her
paramours. If you don't know what a coutesan is, in
simple vulgate --a high-class whore. So, Sir Henry
George Elliot is claiming that our Mysterious Coutesan
(MC) is like a well-known whore (Walters), and she is
"Countess Martini". Fine, we still don't know. You
check a bit and see a few possibilities (but not
plausibilities) such as Countess Theo di Linda von
Martini, convicted and served time for helping to kill
her husband in 1902...oops...can't be our MC. The date
is wrong. Our MC (I feel closer to her if I say 'our')
has to be trailing behind Garibaldi in 1860. So we
still don't know who she is. Sorry.
[Thanks
to William Moloney for bringing this material to my
attention!]
WAIT! This just
in! After further research, Mr. Moloney has
unraveled the mystery. He writes: 'Our MC' seems
certainly to have been the Contessa Maria Maritini
della Torre of whom historian Dennis Mack Smith wrote
in "Garibaldi" (published in New York by Alfred A.
Knopf, Inc.) the following: "Another woman who
adored Garibaldi was the Countess Maria Martini
della Torre. She too met him in London in 1854 but
was already married. Some years later she donned the
red shirt and followed him into battle, ending days
in the madhouse."
There is no
mention of her pretensions to being a second Florence
Nightingale. Mack Smith makes it clear that the real
Florence Nightingale was an active supporter of and
donor to Garibaldi - in contrast to Eliot's assertion
that the Contessa pocketed funds intended for
Garibaldi's campaign.
==========and now the THRILLING CONCLUSION!======================
In the 1982 film An Officer and a Gentleman,
Gunnery Sergeant Emil Foley, played by Louis Gosset,
Jr., is addressing a group of recruits in training at
Aviation Officer Candidate School. One of the recruits
is a young woman. Foley looks at her and says, "Well,
well, another little girl whose daddy wanted a
little boy." Is that what this is about?
Is that what explains Maria Martini? I don't think so.
It's more complicated. Here is her time-line, the
events of her life from birth to death (1831 to 1919).
You can make up your own mind.
"But my hour has not yet come and I say to those who
would shut me up, I have never been anyone's lapdog
and I
never will be."
She also wrote elsewhere: "I will not turn away
from danger or difficulty. Too bad I'm not a man! I
would've made a fine officer,
like my father and brothers. I am inebriated by the
smell of gunpowder, as I showed with
Garibaldi in 1860."
Florence Nightingale was born in 1820
into a wealthy British family in Florence, Tuscany,
Italy, and was named after the city of
her birth.
Florence's older sister, Frances Parthenope
Nightingake was also named after her place of
birth, Parthenope, a Greek
settlement and the original name of Naples.
main sources:
======================================
to history portal
to top of this page